alaska supreme court oral argument alaska supreme court oral argument

From academic advising to student clubs and residence life, we're Oral Arguments - Supreme Court of the United States Even if he had not done so, he could have asked for a continuance of the trial to conduct discovery when Krogman raised the issue, or he could have filed a timely motion to reopen the evidence following the court's application of the presumption against him. Visitors may view ground floor exhibits and portions of the first floor on a self-guided basis. Other matters that the Alaska Supreme Court may review include non-final decisions by lower courts in civil and criminal cases, attorney disciplinary issues, and state law questions that arise in a case in a federal court. (1) If either party desires oral argument on the motion, that party shall request a hearing within five days after service of a responsive pleading or the time limit for filing such a responsive pleading, whichever is earlier. Each justice faces a judicial retention election after their third year of service and once every ten years thereafter. The Court holds oral argument in about 70-80 cases each year. Livestream Hearings can be viewed at: https://stream.akcourts.gov/. The superior court ruled against the legislators, concluding the legislatures actual use of the income remained subject to normal appropriation and veto budgetary processes. A narrower definition is also compelled by Alaska Supreme Court precedent broadly interpreting the dedicated funds clause found in Article : IX, 7. . It must accept appeals from final decisions by the superior court in civil cases (including cases which originated in administrative agencies). Even students who do not want to become paralegals or The thrust of their argument was that a 1976 constitutional amendment creating the Alaska Permanent Fund gave the legislature constitutional authority to pass laws dedicating use of Permanent Fund income without need for annual appropriations and, therefore, not subject to annual gubernatorial veto. PDF NEWS RELEASE: Live Streaming - Alaska 0000001715 00000 n After more than three hours of oral arguments in a single case last week, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts uttered the traditional closer, "The case is submitted.". 375 23 The court also changed the day of one of the scheduled weekly calls between Burns-Marshall and the child. All rights reserved. Restitution Collection, Accessibility Alaska Supreme Court oral arguments for cases scheduled for March and April will be argued by telephone. ability to think through and explain the law, says associate professor Ryan Fortson, All paperwork, except for initial filings, can be scanned (as a PDF file) to 1WRmailbox@akcourts.gov or faxed to (907) 874-3509. All hearings conducted in the Palmer court will be by phone, unless otherwise ordered by the assigned judge. This new classroom will expand the reach of the Legal Studies program into Contact us. Learn more about FindLaws newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy. Appellee. ) 5. PDF Court of Appeals Oral Argument Calendar - Alaska - Opens in New Jury Service Students must then argue 05/09/2023 9:30 am 20 Party Attorney Firm K. K. Public Defender Agency, Anchorage Rachel E. Cella State of Alaska, DHSS, API Laura Emily Wolff Department of Law S18351 City of Valdez v. Krogman testified that Burns-Marshall had sexually assaulted her on a number of occasions and asked the court to apply the statutory presumption regarding domestic violence in its custody determination.1. And the legislature chose to do it anyway because they thought it would save them a lot of money. In general, a title called Section 7 of the Alaska Constitution, positively affirms [that] employees rights once gained cannot be removed, Metcalfe said. v. The court divided the marital property 60/40 in favor of the wife, awarded all of the real property to the husband, and ordered him to make an equalization payment. After her separation from Burns-Marshall, Krogman moved to Arizona. Transcripts for oral arguments prior to October Term 2000 have been scanned from the Supreme Court Library collection. The Alaska Supreme Court hears appeals from lower state courts and also administers the state's judicial system. Supreme Court Calendar (October Term 2022) (PDF) - (Current Term) (Amended Dec. 12, 2022) Supreme Court Calendar . The arguments are an opportunity for the Justices to ask questions directly of the attorneys PDF Alaska Supreme Court, MOJ No. 1957 - cases.justia.com It awarded Burns-Marshall the $112,334.26 in debt on the Anchorage property and $57,008.39 in debt on the Homer property, and stated that Burns-Marshall could choose to keep or sell both properties.2. UAA offers more than 100 degree and certificate programs that consistently prepare students for success after and UAA is a comprehensive, open access, public university established on the ancestral Court System Information urged the West Virginia Supreme Court to join the courts rejecting probable cause and hold "that reason-able suspicion applies here" (Oral Argument at 1:19:29-1:19:45 (Sept. 27, 2022), https://youtu.be/ 2tzFiUgkrAc). But the governor vetoed about half of the appropriation, and the legislature did not override the veto. (a) Composition of Record. A. defend their briefs, but my hope is that the exercise gives them confidence in their The following is a list of conference line numbers for each judge. Generally, the justices will hear arguments in the location of the trial court in which the case was originally decided. They could requalify under Tier I as long as they returned to work by 2010 and paid back their cash out. Oral arguments this semester took place in the Alaska Supreme Court Courtroom in front of Alaska Supreme Court Justice Jennifer S. Henderson. Students can take advantage of cheering for SeawolfNation with free 0000011006 00000 n The court usually announces its decisions of the cases by issuing opinions for official publication (in Westlaw, the Pacific Reporter and the Alaska Reporter) as well as memorandum opinions and judgments (MO&Js) and orders summarily ruling on the merits of cases or dismissing them. 0000009687 00000 n On the afternoon of each argument, the Court posts transcripts of that days arguments. When a position needs to be filled, the Alaska Judicial Council will compile a list of nominees, from which the Governor of Alaska must choose the new justice within 45 days. hbbd``b`AD6`y$$A - F!+hO0012YT"3|0 w( If you have any questions, please contact the court at (907) 747-3291 or send an email to 1SImailbox@akcourts.gov. The Tribe asked the high court to reverse a 2021 Superior Court decision that ruled in favor of the state on a constitutional claim. trailer Student StoriesResearchEvents and HighlightsAlumniIn the News, AwardsCommunityCOVID-19Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, View all COH NewsMedia InquiriesContent Experts. Court of Appeals Oral Argument Calendar April 2023 Anchorage, Boney Courthouse Date Time Minutes Case# Case Name Per Side A13622 Anthony Jenkins-Alexie v. State of Alaska 04/27/2023 9:30 am 30 Party Attorney Firm Anthony Jenkins-Alexie Public Defender Agency, Anchorage Emily L. Jura State of Alaska Donald Soderstrom Attorney General's Office THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA MARK N. WAYSON, Appellant, v. WILLIAM E. STEVENSON, Appellee. ) 0 For an exact broadcast schedule, visit the Gavel to Gavel website or contact them at 1-800-870-5866. Justices must retire from the court when they reach the age of 70. introducing citations to additional sources, United States Territorial District Court for the District of Alaska, List of justices of the Alaska Supreme Court, "A History of the Alaska Federal District Court System 1884-1959, and the Creation of the State Court System", "Alaska Constitution - Article IV The Judiciary - 11. (7) Form of Transcript. There is little likelihood that the appeals court will substantially change its view after oral arguments in the case. (3) Preparation Not at Public Expense. Current MO&Js are also available on the Alaska Court System website. xref The practice of law is always geared in one way or another toward making arguments And having the chance to argue their brief in front of a judge is the reward %PDF-1.7 % financial aid, scholarships, and more. open to the public. : S-18170: LANCE PRUITT v. Cf. PDF Supreme Court of The United States Because the court recognized that it was unrealistic to expect the parties to cooperate to sell the properties, it awarded them to Burns-Marshall. available via our. The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals then partially blocked . The superior court made oral findings on April 27. The cafeteria and gift shop are Midnight Oil. Contact Us After Alaska became a state in 1959, the Alaska Constitution created the Alaska Supreme Court. Although the superior court did not reach this question, the courts ultimate conclusion nevertheless was correct: the legislatures use of Permanent Fund income is subject to normal appropriation and veto budgetary processes. 5 ; The Committee's response to all of these potential impacts is essentially to shrug and leave them for another day. After the second company abandoned the claims, the first company, Justia Opinion Summary: Alaska Venture Capital Group, LLC (AVCG) owned interests in oil and gas leases on state lands. (1) In expedited election appeals under Rule 216.5, oral argument will automatically be held unless it is affirmatively waived under Rule 216.5 (g). Shortly before trial both parties filed trial briefs. 3AN-17-05729 CI ) MEMORANDUM OPINION ) AND JUDGMENT* Gavel Alaska - Supreme Court - KTOO Skylar J. BURNS-MARSHALL, Appellant, v. Victoria A. KROGMAN, Appellee. KTOO. Appearances: Terry M. Parsons, pro se, Hope Mills, North Carolina, Appellant. 0000002547 00000 n PDF Alaska Supreme Court, MOJ No. 1953 - cases.justia.com Wielechowski v. Alaska :: 2017 :: Alaska Supreme Court Decisions Alaska Supreme Court sides with the Division of Elections, allowing AK Supreme Court Opinions and Cases | FindLaw The court denied the motion for reconsideration. academic and personal While its central location is in Anchorage, where it hears arguments monthly, the Alaska Supreme Court also hears arguments in Fairbanks, Juneau, and other locations less regularly. The Court began audio recording oral arguments in 1955. The court also found in the alternative that it would have awarded Krogman sole legal and primary physical custody based upon its consideration of the child's best interests. SCOTUS ruling on abortion pill isn't a victory, WA advocates say S-18082/18101 Created Date: The high court's order halts a decision from Texas-based U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, an appointee of former President Donald Trump who earlier this month ruled against the FDA's 2000 approval of mifepristone, in response to a lawsuit brought by right-wing activists ultimately aiming to end abortion care nationwide.. Retirement", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alaska_Supreme_Court&oldid=1147278660, This page was last edited on 29 March 2023, at 22:25. The Alaska Supreme Court on Wednesday (12-14-22) heard oral arguments in an appeal brought by the Sitka Tribe of Alaska over the management of herring. After this initial election, each justice will go through another retention election every 10 years. Snider v. Snider, 357 P.3d 1180, 1184 (Alaska 2015). A party wishing to cite such a decision in a brief or at oral argument should review Alaska Appellate Rule 214(d). Following his death, Alaska held a special primary election and a special general election to select a candidate to complete the remainder, Justia Opinion Summary: After a mining company abandoned its mining claims, the claims were located and recorded by a second mining company, which also abandoned the claims. Burns-Marshall filed a motion for reconsideration of the superior court's property division, asking the court to consider the costs and risks involved in selling the property and to modify the property division by awarding Krogman the Homer lot or, alternatively, calculating the equalization payment based on the actual sale price. S. Henderson. field, but in everyday life. Calendars and Lists - Supreme Court of the United States The public may watch proceedings on Gavel Alaska, but not attend in-person. 0000003205 00000 n simulated trial with examination of witnesses. Trial courts around the state are conducting video hearings via livestream as authorized by the Presiding Judges' Statewide Order. Dundas, 362 P.3d at 478-80 (finding that tax consequences had to be considered for equipment sold before property division, property already in process of being sold at time of trial, and property that court approved sale of before trial). (6) Costs. Terms of Use, Coordinated Resources Project /CRP/Mental Health Court, The District Court Criminal/Minor Offenses, Defendants who are in Ketchikan are expected to appear in person for criminal hearings. Krogman then called three surrebuttal witnesses. The court denied the motion for reconsideration. Prior to the 2010 Term, the recordings from one Term of Court were not available until the beginning of the next Term. You cant do this. hbbrf`b``3 uz Forms Krogman opposed, arguing that Burns-Marshall was not required to sell either property. The court ordered that Burns-Marshall have contact with the child by Skype or Facetime twice a week. At the time of trial she was enrolled in a nursing program at an Arizona university. They created a new defined contribution retirement plan, referred to as Tier IV with less generous benefits. 13. You already receive all suggested Justia Opinion Summary Newsletters. Alaska Supreme Court oral arguments are broadcast on Gavel to Gavel Alaska on cable systems throughout the state. Justice '07, AK-SAKI conducts research on DPS policies, procedures, Justice Center welcomes back students with a BBQ, Embracing Diversity and Minor, Alaska Native Science and Engineering Program He argued that he would receive significantly less than 40% of the marital estate once the cost of selling the property was taken into account. See what's 0000001252 00000 n CINA/DL Parties: contact the Utqiagvik Court at (907) 852-4800 for call-in information. 0000008355 00000 n endstream endobj 376 0 obj <>/Metadata 72 0 R/Pages 71 0 R/StructTreeRoot 74 0 R/Type/Catalog>> endobj 377 0 obj <>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB]/XObject<>>>/Rotate 0/StructParents 0/Tabs/S/Type/Page>> endobj 378 0 obj [146 0 R] endobj 379 0 obj <> endobj 380 0 obj <>stream It hears cases on a monthly basis in Anchorage, approximately quarterly in Fairbanks and Juneau, and as needed in other Alaska communities. Learn more about admissions processes, taking classes, tour UAA in-person or virtually, and find out more about financial aid. Burns-Marshall argues that the superior court abused its discretion by denying his motion to reopen the trial record 47 days after its oral decision. Cf. The Alaska Supreme Court must review any appeal of a civil case in an Alaska Superior Court or a decision made by an administrative agency. Get free summaries of new Alaska Supreme Court opinions delivered to your inbox! Locations & Hours 0000000016 00000 n 14. The chief justice, Peter Maassen began his term in February 2023, succeeding Justice Daniel Winfree. (this link has information about court calendars for different locations around the state). The Court concluded "no" the 1976 amendment did not exempt the legislatures use of Permanent Fund income from the Constitutions anti-dedication clause. The superior court found no good cause to reopen the trial record and denied the motion. : S-18082 S-18101: IN RE: THE 2021 REDISTRICTING CASES (Matanuska-Susitna Borough: April 21, 2023: Supreme Court Nos. Learn more about UA's notice of nondiscrimination. The Court holds oral argument in about 70-80 cases each year. Sign up for our free summaries and get the latest delivered directly to you. The court meets after oral argument and on a bi-weekly basis to confer on cases argued orally and on cases submitted on the briefs. The appointed justice must be approved by the voters on a nonpartisan ballot at the first statewide general election held more than three years after appointment; thereafter, each justice must participate in another retention election every ten years. %%EOF Supreme Court blocks lower court decision in case on FDA approval of for oral argument, but in the near future, the Legal Studies program will have its At FindLaw.com, we pride ourselves on being the number one source of free legal information and resources on the web. If you are unsure which number to call for your hearing, please contact the court at (907) 463-4700 and hit 0 or send an email to 1JUmailbox@akcourts.gov to verify. Programs, Info for The assignment prepares students to be able to transfer those skills to legal research RELATED: Click to viewPERS Plan Comparison Chartcourtesy of Division of Retirement and Benefits. Southcentral Alaska. Krogman opposed, arguing that Burns-Marshall had waived any right to reopen discovery and that he had actual and constructive notice of the allegations of substance abuse and domestic violence. The trial took place over 4 days in April 2017. The Alaska Legislature may change the court's procedural rules by passing an act expressing its intent to do so by a two-thirds majority of both houses. Because we find that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying Burns-Marshall's motion to present additional evidence we do not reach his due process argument. endstream endobj startxref College, Alaska Native Science & Engineering Program (ANSEP), Alaska Native Tab/Window, - Opens in New She argued the superior court erred by relying on a cursory report from. Hearings & Trials - Alaska Court System Alaska Native curriculum at UAA provides an in-depth perspective on contemporary Alaska Native societies, You're all set! UAA strives to make its online experiences accessible. Courts yearly calendar. Oral arguments are scheduled for May 17 in the Texas case, but it is expected to make it to the Supreme Court eventually, along with a case from Washington seeking instead to broaden access to . Alternate conference lines (toll free): 1-877-853-5247 or 1-833-548-0276 or 1-833-548-0282, See also Court Calendars, Court Directory, Filing Instructions, Search Cases. Alaska Supreme Court Oral Arguments - KTOO 180 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<165A4196B83FBD4C8B5F2921154FFD01>]/Index[166 32]/Info 165 0 R/Length 76/Prev 274855/Root 167 0 R/Size 198/Type/XRef/W[1 2 1]>>stream Mariah B. v. State of Alaska, DHSS, OCS :: 2022 :: Alaska Supreme Court Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images. Metcalfe had brief stints working for the state in 1972 and 1980 and qualified for what later was known as Tier I in PERS, or the Public Employees Retirement System. For the written portion of the A party wishing to cite such a decision in a brief or at oral argument should review Alaska Appellate Rule 214(d). Supreme Court Oral Argument Calendar May 2023 Anchorage, Boney Courthouse Case Name Date Time Minutes Case# Per Side S18050 Hospitalization of K.K. Until the creation of the court of appeals in 1980, the supreme court was also required to accept appeals from final decisions in criminal cases; now, however, the court of appeals fills this role, although the supreme court still has jurisdiction to exercise its discretion to accept appeals from decisions of the court of appeals (or upon certification from the court of appeals that the case involves a significant question of constitutional law or an issue of substantial public interest). Mr. Guarnieri. [1], The court originally consisted of two associate justices and a chief justice. Under the Alaska Constitution, the supreme court establishes rules for the administration of all courts in the state and for practice and procedure in civil and criminal cases. Parents/Guardians, Alaska 0000001372 00000 n 375 0 obj <> endobj When possible, students travel to a judges courtroom Several students have commented to me that it has inspired them to pursue their legal careers further," Fortson says. She contended the court erred by moving forward with an adjudication hearing without having, Justia Opinion Summary: A woman who suffered from schizophrenia appealed court orders authorizing her involuntary commitment and administration of psychotropic medication. ORAL ARGUMENTS. Native Studies - Anchorage, Alaska They also can be removed, suspended, or censured at the discretion of the Supreme Court, based on a recommendation by the Alaska Commission on Judicial Conduct. Please refer to the 30-day rolling calendar Please disregard any stray or handwritten markings on these copies. The decision provides a second chance for many as 78,000 Alaskans to get back into the states coveted and most generous retirement plan. Tiffany A. Semenza v. Jeffrey Rady (Unpublished), AVCG, LLC v. Alaska Department of Natural Resources, Jack W. Fredrickson v. Allison O. Hackett (Unpublished), Terry M. Parsons v. Craig City School District and Alaska Municipal League Joint Insurance Association (Unpublished), Michael Mann Jr. v. Hannah Maus (Unpublished), M.T. Alaska Supreme Court, Opinion No. courtroom will encourage more students to experience Legal Studies courses. success and well-being. The court also ordered that, if Krogman was still on the title for the Homer property, Burns-Marshall had to remove her from the title within a year or sell the property. Although the MO&Js and most orders are not published, the MO&Js are available for public inspection at the Anchorage, Fairbanks, and Juneau offices of the clerk of the appellate courts, and the orders are filed in the clerk's Anchorage office. While its central location is in Anchorage, where it hears arguments monthly, the Alaska Supreme Court also hears arguments in Fairbanks, Juneau, and other locations less regularly. A weekly Alaska news email from KTOO. Krogman's counsel did not question him about domestic violence or substance abuse. The husband filed a motion to reopen the evidence regarding domestic violence and substance abuse more than a month after the court's oral decision. The Alaska Airlines Center and Seawolf Sports Complex offer recreation as well oral argument in front of a judge on a legal brief written by the students, and a Burns-Marshall also called several witnesses including one who mentioned an incident during which Krogman threw a picture frame at Burns-Marshall. Rikelman speaks to abortion rights supporters after the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments on March 4, 2020 Alyssa SchukarCenter for Reproductive Rights/AP 'Concerning for the rule of law' 197 0 obj <>stream Students really appreciate appearing before an actual judge and receiving feedback.