stellarvue 82 degree eyepiece stellarvue 82 degree eyepiece

Another good example is the 50mm finderscope, from both WO and SV (I have both, mostly the same, both excellent). I missed the 16mm and regretted it as it's a very useful focal length. Fancy eyepieces are expensive, simpler eyepieces can be nearly as good and much more affordable. When using hand driven alt-azimuth mounts this generous field will be appreciated. EPs: ES 2 . Have fun experimenting! Pros: Best eye relief and off-axis star images. I think these are the same that WO(?) Note: For definitions of basic eyepiece characteristics mentioned below, see Ed Tings A Beginners Guide to Telescope Eyepieces. I test ZWOs new ASIAir Mini. Its smaller, lighter, and cheaper than the bigger ASIAir Plus astrophoto computer, but is it as good? My conclusion upon testing this 100 group was that performance was more or less commensurate with price. The Explore 100 comes a very close second to Tele Vue in sharpness, with stars sharp across 90 percent of the field and still well contained at the edge. You currently have javascript disabled. Click here to simulate the field of view. How are the new Orion SkyQuest dobsonians? I've spent a decent amount of time with an 82-degree eyepiece, but the extra field never seemed very immersive to me. This eyepiece is ideal for higher power work on planets and double stars since it is very sharp, contrasty and has a generous 82 degree field of view. MyGermanUniversity.com is Germany's largest database for English-language Bachelors and Masters programs (refers to degree programs with at least 50% English-taught course modules from German universities). The rubber eyecup can be raised higher with the use of an included extension ring; a twist-up mechanism would have been preferable. You probably won't notice the difference. I think you will find a wide range of preferences. FWIW I looked at the Pleiades yesterday with a 32mm Plossl, a 24mm UFF (~65 AFOV) with my XT10 which has the same focal length as your telescope. Stellarvue EOP-09.0 Does anyone know anything about the new Stellarvue UWA's? In my 80/480 refractor, I find even 50 degrees for "high" power to be quite good--e.g., Nagler 3-6 zoom. Bottom Line: The best for optics but others provide more comfortable viewing. A 20mm eyepiece with a 100 field for only $300 seems too good to be true! Eye relief is a comfortable 13mm and theres no annoying kidney-bean shadowing of the exit pupil, true of the others in this group. The result is the equivalent to your grade in the German grading system, where 1.0 is the maximum grade and 4.0 the minimum passing grade. Nuff said! They were identical to the UWANs (and 5 other brands of the same eyepieces). At a measured 13mm, eye relief seems a little tight, and 1.5mm less than specified, due to the eye lens being more deeply recessed than in the others. Maybe Vic star tests these though! Telescope Eyepiece Kits | Shop Baader, Televue & Celestron Eyepieces In this complete system we include the large 28mm 2" wide field eyepiece for low power, the 8mm ultra-wide angle eyepiece for medium power, and for high power we provide the 4 mm ultra-wide angle eyepiece. Cons: Short eye relief and non-adjustable eyecup. But the soft eyecup nicely places your eye where it needs to be with no kidney-bean blackout. I tested nine brands of 82 eyepieces, all in the 13 mm to 16 mm range, a focal length that provides moderate power on most telescopes and so is suitable for all types of viewing. Thus my max AFOVs are; 2.5 is 45 degrees, 3.5 is 65, 4 is 45 degrees, 4.5 is 76 degrees, 5 and 5.2 are 65 degrees, 6.5 is 76 degrees, 7 and 8 are 65 degrees, 9 is 76 degrees, 10 is 70 degrees, 12 is 92 degrees, 13 is 65 degrees, 14 is 80 degrees, 15 is 62 degrees, 17 is 92 degrees, 18 is 62 degrees, 20 is 80 degrees, 22 is 82 degrees, 25 is 60 degrees, 26 is 62 degrees, 28 is 68 degrees, 30 is 80 degrees, 31 is 82 degrees, 34 is 68 degrees, 40 is 70 degrees, 55 is 50 degrees. public University. I'll have to change this in the upcoming 2017 Buyer's Guide. I find the Televue better, but both the ES and UWA are very close. Edited by Someone4322, 06 March 2023 - 03:36 AM. Mega gratz on your new scope NIckwin. At under $200 this eyepiece is a great way to get those wide views at a reasonable price. If I'm pleased with the SV 28, I may just go with SVs to complete a set, we'll see. The true field of view is 0.75 degrees, with an exit pupil of about 1.9 mm. If the ones from Stellarvue also share these specs, then there is no doubt they come from the same assembly line. It is Bavaria's largest city and the third largest city in Germany (after Berlin and Hamburg). The A-T is darn close, but does give more magnification and FOV. I've had both and they are excellent (and same price)! The Stellarvue 82 is well made, with a compact, solid construction, good 14mm of eye relief (better than the stated 12mm) and a fold-up eyecup. But it is an excellent eyepiece, for $80 less than the Tele Vue Ethos. It is important the image stays sharp as it crosses the field, and it does in both eyepieces, but the Ethos SX is better for double stars and planets. Bottom Line: A top-class eyepiece for optics and build quality. I really like the 82 FoV in my scope, great image, easy to manage and store. He (or his expertly trained staff)machines optical tubes and adapters, polishes lenses, fabricates altazmounts, and yes his triple testing of his refractorsis now legendary! If the grading system of your university uses letter grades, you can assign a number to each letter grade. Field Stop: 13.6 mm Number of Lens Elements & Groups: 7 elements Special Features: Tapered insert tube Comes with Dust Caps? Going Wider: Five 100-Degree Eyepieces Compared This particular line saw its sales creamed by the superior ES 82s when the price on the latter was reduced. Theres a new alternative for the Celestron NexStar SE and NexStar Evolution series tripod a short, foldable tabletop tripod. It just felt like a 68-degree field that was pushed slightly further out. Pros: Very good optics and waterproof construction. It's all part of the marketing game. They slap on the "15mm" on the side and everybody assumes it is actually 15mm, when it is really 14mm. Light Benders: 2" Astro-Physics MaxBright, 2" iStar dielectric, 2" Stellarvue Deluxe, 2" TAL/ NPZ dielectric, 2" Baader Amici prism . Then MyGermanUniversity is the right place for you. His website at www.amazingsky.com has galleries of his images, plus links to his product review blog posts, video tutorials, and ebooks on astrophotography. I wouldn't expect additional focal lengths. With some help from the members here, I'm awaiting a 28mm 82 degree Stellarview EP. In eyepieces, models with the extreme apparent field of 100 rank at the top for performance - but also price! In my scopes, I generally use the 3.5 mm Nagler with the 2X TV Barlow as my highest magnification. Astronomy Clubs, Star Parties, Shows, & Conferences, Community Forum Software by IP.BoardLicensed to: Cloudy Nights, This is not recommended for shared computers. You would recognize the names of the OEMs if I told you. New guy struggling with eyepiece decisions - Cloudy Nights Pros: Very good optical performance and construction; long eye relief. The 28mm has a 2" barrel, the rest are 1.25". I think probably not. I find the Televue better, but both the ES and UWA are very close. Your scope is a f5.9. I doubt Vic Maris will reveal who his OEM is. ), Call us at: 530 823 7796 Open Mon-Fri 9-5 Pacific Time, Read the review of the Stellarvue Optimus eyepieces by Tony Hallas in the May 2017 issue of Astronomy, Our EOP eyepieces are now loaded into AstronomyTools database and application. I would be very surprised to find out that this new Stellarvue line is not the same as the new TS UWAN line. Are these made by United Optical? Reducer Flatteners for other telescopes, Finderscope Eyepieces with Focusing Reticle, Barlows to double the power of your eyepieces, Stellarvue Ultra Wide Angle Eyepiece Set - EUW-SET, Stellarvue Optimus Eyepiece Set with Case - EOP-SET, Stellarvue 4 mm Ultra Wide Angle 1.25" Eyepiece - EUW-04.0, Stellarvue 15 mm Ultra Wide Angle 1.25" Eyepiece - EUW-15.0, Stellarvue 8 mm Ultra Wide Angle 1.25" Eyepiece - EUW-08.0. Bottom Line: A good, economical choice for Schmidt-Cassegrains. I love my 20mm 100 degree eyepiece. A+ is the highest possible grade, and the lowest grade to pass a course is D. So if you assign numerical values in ascending order starting with 1, the input for the grade conversion is as follows: In the conversion tool, you enter 1as maximum grade (corresponding to A+), and 5 asminimum passing grade (corresponding to D). I saw clear, sharp, spacious views of Jupiter and the Moon when I first tried this eyepiece, and it also works well on double stars. Bottom Line: A superb and compact top-class eyepiece. Good decision! The amount of head tilt needed to see the edges of the field are less than other ~100 degree eyepieces, including Ethos, ES, and APM. That's easier with the smaller size of the 82 Naglers when compared to the 100 eyepieces, however I'm working on that. The 28mm has a 2" barrel, the rest are 1.25". For a differentiated assessment of the examination performances, the grades can be increased or decreased by 0.3 to intermediate values; the grades 0.7 and 5.3 are excluded. Munich | Germany, History, Population, Oktoberfest, Map, & Facts Maybe the following might help: This shows the FoV for a 28mm 82 deg, a 25mm plossl, and a 7mm Xcel EP on my Orion XT8 ( 203mm/1200mm = f5.9), Jon, I 'll be needing some guidance soon; the 28/82 is on the way: using that and my 7mm Xcel as a base, I'll be upgrading/replacing the others to flesh out a "good" set. Alan Dyer is an astrophotographer and astronomy author based in Alberta, Canada. Effect of barlows / field flatness for AT60ED solar imaging, Jon Isaacs, SpaceConqueror3 and mrsjeff like this, sportsmed, edsmx5 and Someone4322 like this, Dave Mitsky, John Huntley, CeleNoptic and, izar187, pj_thomas and Alex Swartzinski like this. Make no mistake, these are large and heavy eyepieces, with some requiring 2-inch focusers. This 9 mm eyepiece is ideal for moderate power work on moons, planets and dark sky objects. Old, from WO. I purchased the 9mm to pair with the 20mm Optimus for my Stellarvue SVX125D refractor. 15mm Stellarvue is identical to the 14mm ES 82, field curvature and all, as noted above. If you're not sensitive to curvature perhaps give it a go but honestly if you have on hand a 2x and a 3x barlow just get the 15mm because then you'll have all three. But the twist-up mechanism in one unit I tested (which I exchanged) was loose and rattled. Cheers. Cons: Slightly soft off-axis performance. Looks like at this time they are all available. Some people love the porthole views of 100-degree eyepieces, and others like me would rather have a cozy field stop that's easy to take in with long eye relief. Alan Dyer is an astrophotographer and astronomy author based in Alberta, Canada. I'm hoping they will be sharp to the edge at f/7. Anything more than 82 would have me wasting time rolling my head seeing "what's out there" vs concentrating on what's in the center of the field. Those look just like the WO UWANs, and they are in the exact same focal lengths. Study in Munich: 15 Universities, 231 English programs STELLARVUE OPTIMUS 20MM 100deg 2.0" 9-ELEMENT EYEPIECE Description Technical Specs Extended Information Stellarvue Optimus 20mm 100deg 2" 9-element eyepiece--lighter and sharper than its competition, this eyepiece redefines "wide" field. This is why some wide field EP's cost more, some, a lot more. I recently upgraded my 30mm that came with my Dob to a APM 30mm UFF and its a great EP. These wider fields allow me to see things with my peripheral vision and make the whole experience that much more comfortable and enjoyable. Orion sold them as did WO too. The ES is solidly made and comfortable to use despite its short 11mm eye relief (measured from the top of the eyecup), due to the recessed eye lens (the specs state 15.6mm). I've used them at outreach events and the nice eye relief and the wide viewport really help the public get a good view, especially the little ones that often struggle to find the image. (Cheaper products abound, but you never know what you'll get. Pinpoint stars to the edge, M27 is amazing in my 14" Dobsonian. I strongly recommend both the 20 mm and 9 mm Optimus. This is a recommended complete set of eyepieces for use with any Stellarvue telescope from the SV70T to the SV152 Flagship! Edited by 25585, 06 March 2023 - 09:04 AM. Heres a low-cost zoom eyepiece that actually works well. But the price is the highest. F/7 is more forgiving than faster scopes so that does help. At TUM, grades from 1 to 5 are assigned. I just purchased a SV80A (really excited) and they had deal going where you get the 8mm and 15mm for a little over $100 so I jumped on it. I do most of my observing with 82 degree eyepieces. And there are some very good options.. For wide field eyepieces, TeleVue introduced nearly all the modern designs starting with the first Nagler more than 40 years ago. As the object, or area of an object, being viewed, often take up a very small area of the field of view. The specifications state an 86 apparent field but it appeared to be the same as the other 82 models. Edited by David E, 08 October 2014 - 08:14 PM. A great one-two punch when observing. But it just matters on if you need the eye relief or not, the AT UWA 28 would be great as well if not wearing glasses. Faster scopes (below f5.9) are more sensitive and require more expensive EP's and a probably a coma corrector. With the 20 mm I will then have 32, 20, 16 and 10 mm equivalents. Today, they report 4mm, 8mm, and 15mm and are $50 apiece less expensive, at $149 each. I would target a 12mm-13mm for my first EP purchase. But the original Ethos remains unmatched for optics. Pop. At 564 grams even with its 2-inch adapter tube, Stellarvue's Optimus is the lightest of the 100 set, a consideration for balancing smaller telescopes. 70 is fine at low power, 78-85 fine at medium power, but I prefer 110 at high power. So that this makes sense - take your 30mm SuperView, focus on a nice cluster of stars (M45 akaPleiades is a great one). Other than that, this eyepiece is excellent and certainly merits your consideration. Either model represents an excellent value in a mega-wide eyepiece. Pros: Very comfortable eye relief; superb optics. Explore Scientific 11 mm - 82 Argon Purged Waterproof 1.25" Eyepiece SKU: EXS-EPWP8211-01 Focal Length: 11 mm Apparent Field of View: 82 degrees Barrel Size: 1.25" Eye Relief: 15.6 mm Free shipping $229.99 In Stock Add to cart As low as $7.43/Month Apertura 9mm - 27mm Zoom Eyepiece SKU: APT-ZOOM927 Focal Length: 9mm - 27mm 82 Degree Ultra Wide Angle Eyepieces - Stellarvue Never occurred to me that they might actually be the same. 51,000 students. I am fortunate that I do not need to wear glasses.. Over the years, I have built up a collection of eyepieces that includes multiple sets. New from Stellarvue, ultra-wide eyepieces. I tested these on f/6 apo refractors and f/5 to f/6 Newtonian reflectors, concentrating on comparing on-axis and off-axis sharpness. Cons: Soft off-axis star images. Pros: Great optics; comfortable eye relief and eyecup. I need at least 22mm of effective eye relief. Click here to simulate the field of viewhttps://astronomy.tools/, Posted by philip fontaine on 4th Aug 2022. (1) it seems that for observer favorite FOV is defined by nature of human eye: 120-140 deg. Honestly, I don't mind a 50-degree view, but 70 is definitely more immersive. The A-T 28UWA/StellarVue 82 and APM 30UFF has already been mentioned in this thread. There's also a comfort factor. Kunming maybe? Hmmm, looks like those four focal lengths are the only ones they make, at least for now. I've been thinking about getting the 15mm as my first non-cheapo eyepiece so I'm looking forward to hearing what you think about it. On axis the field is nice but as you creep out from the center the curvature becomes apparent. With the eyecup folded down it can be used with eyeglasses, but only just. I had the 15mm and it lasted 2 weeks in my case. Both have the same true FOV and cover the cluster nicely. An important factor is whether you have astigmatism in your observing eye and need to wear glasses when observing,. They are still the best but are expensive. As objects get smaller, and magnification gets higher, I think I appreciate a view that is tightened up a bit. Click here to simulate the field of view, 3. Or know anything about the design and/or origins? This was part of a 3 piece set and I won't be using this one. Eye relief is an excellent 17 mm, longer than in more premium models, and the eyecup is extendable. The 102 degree Nikon HWs are another good example. Note: For definitions of basic eyepiece characteristics mentioned below, see Ed Tings A Beginners Guide to Telescope Eyepieces. There are also 60 degree eyepieces like the Starguider ED and Paradigms. Today, they report 4mm, 8mm, and 15mm and are $50 apiece less expensive, at $149 each. This 9 mm eyepiece is ideal for moderate power work on moons, planets and dark sky objects. But I'm interested in the 16mm as I don't have a UWA in that focal length (I used to have the old 5000 series Meade 18mm UWA but sold it). Collecting EP's is a journey for sure in finding out what you really like. The Stellarvue 82 and Meades new PWA provide good performance for a much lower price. As Jon said, it will take some time to build an eyepiece range. display: none !important; The apparent field is indeed noticeably wider than the other 82s. I have a tendency to increase the apparent field as the magnification goes up so I don't have to push the dob quite as much. Pros: Great optics; wider field; comfortable eye relief and eyecup. 15mm Stellarvue is identical to the 14mm ES 82, field curvature and all, as noted above. The result given here is non-binding, as this grade converter can only provide a general first estimation. Those I find are easiest to use. At NEAF, I purchased the 16mm UWA from Stellarvue for $95. The latter had good optical performance, but with a twist-up eyecup mechanism that was stiff and greasy in the unit I tested. Cons: Very aberrated off-axis star images; slightly less than 82 field. Anything is possible. Stars are sharp across all but the outer 15 percent of the field and are still tight at the edge, though with some lateral chromatic aberration. Introducing the new Stellarvue Ultra Wide Angle eyepiece series. Returned it. You will get more use out of middle and low magnification EP's now. In the 10 inch, that's 820x, the TFoV is slightly less than 6 arc-minutes, 1/10 of a degree. The Stellarvue Ultrawide eyepiece set includes three eyepieces: 4.0 mm 1.25" Ultrawide angle eyepiece with 82 degree apparent field of view ( click here for specifications) 8.0 mm 1.25" Ultrawide angle eyepiece with 82 degree apparent field of view ( click here for specifications) I've owned all the WO UWAN in the past but sold off all of them except the 4mm. For me, anything 60 degrees or greater feels sufficiently wide. Stars begin to distort in the outer 25 percent of the field, so worse than the Explore Scientific and Tele Vue Ethos, but still very good, especially for the price. But I still prefer the Ethos SX on Uranus and Neptune because it gives me a much longer time between nudges and that allows me to relax more when looking. The most eyepieces I use are 65 to 70 degrees. Munich, Bavaria, Germany Monthly Weather | AccuWeather Introducing the Stellarvue Optimus eyepiece series. The Panoptic 27mm has an even more pleasing view. Also, I view with eyeglasses because of my severe astigmatism. At least I think they are new because I can't find anything about these focal lengths, they currently have 4, 8, and 15mm available. I find the 82 degree fields of my Explore Scientific 9mm to be less accessible, though it is a nice sharp view. Pros: Good off-axis sharpness and eye relief, but . I just ordered two 1.25" 32 mm 52 degree GSO eyepieces from Agena Astro because I would like to have that wider TFOV. That is a beast and my first 2 eyepiece. I don't know how much help my opinion will be but I will certainly share what I can when I have them in front of me. All marketing. You currently have javascript disabled. But then again, thats more or less the point the eyepiece gets out of the way so you no longer have the sense you are looking through a round porthole or window. Bottom Line: Very good optics and mechanics for an excellent price. The jump from 50 to 70 provides a much larger leap than 70 to 100 to my eyes. I test ZWOs new ASIAir Mini. Of the lower-cost 82 models, this was a good choice overall for both optics and mechanics. Well to be honest, United Optics products tend to be quite good, whether branded as WO or SV, or something else. Nice detail of the moon and the cloud bands on Jupiter. I once read that Televue actually bench tests all of their eyepieces before delivery to their customers or dealers; if so they may be unique in this regard. Like the Ethos, it can be used as either a 2-inch or 1.25-inch eyepiece. With 20mm of eye relief and a large eye lens, this is a very comfortable eyepiece to look through. Incredible clarity across the entire field of view. Stellarvue Ultra Wide Angle EP's - Eyepieces - Cloudy Nights Stellarvue 4 mm Ultra Wide Angle 1.25" Eyepiece - EUW-04.. Waiting Period: We are in continuous production and operate one year in advance. I have a tendency to increase the apparent field as the magnification goes up so I don't have to push the dob quite as much. His website at www.amazingsky.com has galleries of his images, plus links to his product review blog posts, video tutorials, and ebooks on astrophotography. Well to be honest, United Optics products tend to be quite good, whether branded as WO or SV, or something else. This eyepiece gives me 133x mag in my 10 inch Dobsonian. Read Alan Dyers comparison of nine 82-degree eyepieces, Tag List TELESCOPE meade eyepiece Explore Scientific tele vue omegon stellarvue. Stellarvue SVX127D We have the same scope, so I can give you a few pointers to consider. I have never used any of the super mega ultra extra wide eyepieces. In short, I found it uncomfortable to use. I tested this set on f/6 apo refractors and f/5 to f/6 Newtonian reflectors, concentrating on comparing on-axis and off-axis sharpness. Report back witn with your thoughts when you get a chance. I like having eyepieces at my fingertips. While stars do bloat a little at the very edge, the 83 SSW comes close to matching a Nagler for optical performance, with the benefit of slightly longer 14mm eye relief and a more comfortable twist-up eyecup.