This, in turn, means that the status Awaiting decision refers to the decision that the editor will take about whether your paper will be sent for peer review or desk rejected. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. Usually, the times vary from two to six months, but there is no fixed rule. [CDATA[> You said the finals started tomorrow. How long should we wait if the current status of the manuscript is good . Nature editors will normally honour requests that a paper not be sent to one or two (but no more) competing groups for review. Frontiers | Editors between Support and Control by the Digital n/a. Under these circumstances, authors are strongly advised not to resubmit a revised version as it will be declined without further review. [2] In any state, sovereignty is assigned to the person, body, or institution that has the ultimate authority over other people in order to establish a law or change . Answered by Editage Insights Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. //-->Sovereignty - Wikipedia reach a conclusion of interest to an interdisciplinary readership. What does this mean and should I contact the editor? volume5,page 917 (2002)Cite this article. editor decision started under consideration. [CDATA[// >sciencenature - Icons made by various authors from www.flaticon.com, Experiential Live Edit: How to improve Biomed manuscripts. Peer review comments, cover letter and more. At each stage, the editor will discuss the manuscript with editorial colleagues in the light of referees reports, and send a letter to the author offering one of the following options: Editors letters also contain detailed guidance about the papers format and style where appropriate (see below), which should be read in conjunction with the manuscript formatting guide when revising and resubmitting. The initial judgement is not a reflection on the technical validity of the work described, or on its importance to people in the same field. Most journals typically take around 4-12 weeks to share their final decision. Was your paper accepted? Even if the reviewers give positive recommendations, the editor can decide to reject a paper. So, it probably means that the associate editor (AE), who handles the manuscript through the review and publication process, had a look at your manuscript and made a decision on it, most probably for rejection. I've had Nature hold up papers for months and been forced out by a singe powerful reviewer with advice to publish the paper in another highly ranked (but not glamour mag) journal. Is it fair to reject manuscript with few words of comments after long 9 months of review? //-->