/K [11 511 0 R] 325 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) >> /S /P 19 0 obj 0000009036 00000 n endobj >> /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 16 0 R /Rotate 0 /StructParents 34 /Lang (EN-US) The defendant may not call the prosecutors as witnesses unless there is a compelling need to do so. /S /P << endobj >> << /Tabs /S << /Lang (EN-US) Ct., 719 P.2d 699, 704 (Colo. 1986). /Type /Page /Tabs /S /P 530 0 R endobj >> /Pg 17 0 R 314 0 obj /Count 5 /S /P << /Lang (EN-US) /S /H1 /P 531 0 R /S /P endobj 257 0 obj /Pg 17 0 R /Pg 44 0 R In the motion, Petitioner alleged he was . /Contents [368 0 R 369 0 R 370 0 R] >> endobj >> endobj >> 288 0 obj /Pg 30 0 R /P 529 0 R endobj /P 12 0 R /K 17 << /Resources 395 0 R 104 0 obj /S /P 16 0 obj /K 0 %%EOF /S /P /Lang (EN-US) << /Lang (EN-US) endobj /Tabs /S /P 531 0 R /K [54 301 0 R 56] endobj >> As the motion describes, the purpose of the Compensation Pilot is to address a financial /S /P /S /H2 /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 16 0 R /Resources 482 0 R 297 0 obj /P 508 0 R 1992)). /K 1 << /Annots [] /S /P /P 12 0 R endobj Second, take effective steps to mitigate, if not eliminate, risks that a former clients confidences and secrets might be accessible to attorneys working on a matter involving the former client. /K 5 /P 12 0 R endobj /P 56 0 R However, disqualification is a harsh measure. /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /Tabs /S /S /P 0000002515 00000 n /Lang (EN-US) 237 0 obj Attempting to defeat the motion without advising the client is not an acceptable solution. endobj /Lang (EN-US) << << 45 0 obj /Pg 37 0 R A motion to disqualify shall be . /S /P /Lang (EN-US) Xcentric Ventures, LLC et al v. Stanley et al. /S /H3 endobj >> /S /P /Pg 16 0 R endobj Defendant's Motion at 1. /Parent 6 0 R /S /P /Resources 494 0 R endobj 313 0 obj 27 [165 0 R 166 0 R 167 0 R 168 0 R null 331 0 R null] /Pg 45 0 R the entire judicial process' when deciding a motion to disqualify an attorney pursuant to K.R.P.C. endobj In this case, the defendant has failed to demonstrate a compelling need for the prosecutors' testimony or that the information sought cannot be obtained from an alternative source. << >> 83 0 obj . !location.countrycode?location.countryName :location.officeName }}, {{ getActiveCase(headerData.languageLinks,'active',true).languageCode | uppercase}}, {{ getActiveCase(headerData.languageLinks,'active',true).name}}. << I don't recommend it, but this is what you must do to get a judge /S /P >> Peters v. Dist. /P 505 0 R 161), filed on October 7, 2020" . /Tabs /S /Lang (EN-US) /Rotate 0 >> /Parent 7 0 R endobj /P 12 0 R endobj /P 12 0 R endobj /Pg 15 0 R endobj See Swisher, The Practice and Theory of Lawyer Disqualification, 27 Geo. >> /Lang (EN-US) /K 2 /P 509 0 R 249 0 obj endobj Beddow, Erben & Bowen, P.A Second Floor - 2019 Building 2019 3rd Avenue, North Birmingham, AL 35203. 361 0 obj /Type /Page >> /Marked true /Lang (EN-US) /Contents [441 0 R 442 0 R 443 0 R] Disqualification motions implicate the most important duties that an attorney owes a client: the duties of confidentiality and loyalty. 241 0 obj << /P 298 0 R /Parent 9 0 R /S /P 1857 0 obj <>stream 0000006382 00000 n endobj 261 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) 243 0 R 244 0 R 245 0 R 246 0 R 247 0 R 248 0 R 249 0 R 250 0 R 251 0 R 252 0 R /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) 438 0 obj DONE AND ENTERED THIS _________ day of ____________ , 1997. His argument is self-defeating. /P 12 0 R Co. v. Isham, 782 F.Supp. 17 0 obj endobj endobj By far the majority of successful motions to disqualify are brought on the basis of a conflict of interest with a former or concurrent client or imputation, but attorneys should also be aware that successful motions to disqualify have been brought on the following bases, among others: (1) lawyer as witness, (2) appearance of impropriety, (3) receipt of confidential data, (4) personal interest, (5) violation of the no contact rules, and (6) misconduct with a witness. /Pg 41 0 R Government Caught Between a Recusal Motion and Desperation 26 [160 0 R 161 0 R 162 0 R null 327 0 R null 328 0 R null 329 0 R 162 0 R endobj 358 0 obj 132 0 obj /S /TOCI RESPONSE TO ORDER REGARDING APPOINTMENT, MOTION TO DISQUALIFY PRESIDING OFFICER, AND MOTION FOR A STAY PENDING RESOLUTION OF THE MOTION TO DISQUALIFY I, Adam C. Sloane, hereby state that: 1. /Annots [] /P 506 0 R /Pg 16 0 R 0000009504 00000 n 278 0 obj 138 0 obj /Rotate 0 /Rotate 0 /A 499 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /S /P endobj << /K 9 endobj /P 55 0 R /P 163 0 R /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) endobj << << _______________/s/_______________ MARK R. ROSMAN Attorney-in-Charge Florida State Bar No. 364 0 obj >> /Pg 17 0 R We are hired both to file and pursue disqualification, and to represent lawyers in resisting disqualification. endobj 65 0 obj /P 12 0 R /S /P /Lang (EN-US) endobj J. << endobj << 219 0 R 220 0 R 221 0 R 222 0 R 223 0 R 224 0 R 225 0 R 226 0 R 227 0 R 228 0 R /Tabs /S endobj >> >> /K 6 /Pg 17 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Kids [35 0 R 36 0 R 37 0 R 38 0 R 39 0 R] However, as cited in Respondents' brief, there are specific provisions of the Washington constitution, state statutes, and case law regarding representation of the Insurance /P 509 0 R /S /P << /Lang (EN-US) /S /P << >> /Resources 432 0 R As another court has observed "[t]he law does not liberally permit a defendant to call a prosecutor as a witness. /K 2 /K 8 /Lang (EN-US) << >> endobj /Pg 45 0 R << /P 505 0 R >> PDF Attorney for Petitioner - Washington State Courts Washington Courts /S /P /Resources 418 0 R >> Secure .gov websites use HTTPS /S /H3 endobj /Annots [] /S /P /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] >> endobj >> 321 0 obj << >> /K 23 /Type /StructTreeRoot /P 12 0 R on January 7, 2002. >> >> 174 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /Annots [457 0 R 458 0 R] >> << >> endobj 191 0 R] /Pg 24 0 R >> << 2. << /S /P << >> /S /Link 1 / Employees of the U.S. Department of Justice have no authority to testify until the procedures set forth in 28 C.F.R. /Lang (EN-US) >> /Outline /Span 343 0 obj /K 4 /P 12 0 R PDF Franklin Circuit Court Division I Case No. 18-ci-379 Electronically Filed endobj /K [10 527 0 R] Conflict violations are not always the focal point for resolution of a motion to disqualify. /Pg 44 0 R /P 12 0 R /Annots [] /K 8 266 0 obj <>stream /StructParents 17 /Lang (EN-US) /Tabs /S endobj /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R /Pg 20 0 R /S /P /Lang (EN-US) >> 17, 2020), the Central District of California decided a motion to disqualify brought by the defendant based on two grounds: (1) a purported conflict based on plaintiff's counsel's prior employment by the defendant; and (2) plaintiff's counsel's improper receipt of information, procured >> /Pg 17 0 R In denying the defendants' motion, the court relied on the fact that there were other investigating agents present at the meeting who could testify to what occurred during the meeting. 7 0 obj << >> endobj 25 [158 0 R 159 0 R] /P 531 0 R /CropBox [0 0 612 792] << >> /P 508 0 R /S /P endobj 0 endobj /K 6 107 0 R 108 0 R 109 0 R 110 0 R 111 0 R 112 0 R 113 0 R 114 0 R 115 0 R 116 0 R /Pg 44 0 R by the party The law with respect to disqualification varies depending on the conflict relation and the poten-tially harmed party. 2022 California Rules of Court. endobj /S /P /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) << /P 12 0 R /Pg 22 0 R endobj << endobj /Pg 31 0 R 12] and Memorandum in Support [Doc. /P 123 0 R /Pg 19 0 R << >> endobj ECF No. << << /K 15 /P 12 0 R /P 12 0 R >> << /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 27 0 R << << /P 12 0 R /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /K 31 << 184 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) 111 0 obj endobj /P 12 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] endobj 133 0 obj endobj << RESPONSE TO SOME SPECIFIC CLAIMS OF IMPROPRIETY IN THE MOTION TO DISQUALIFY (1) THE CLAIM: Special Counsel breached confidentiality by allowing a DMS employee to be present for sworn testimony of numerous witnesses. /Pg 17 0 R /Pg 16 0 R /Rotate 0 1, WSBA Public Information on Mary Ann Strickler). 3 [null 304 0 R 305 0 R 304 0 R null 306 0 R 307 0 R 306 0 R null 308 0 R the matters involved in both representations are substantially related, and. /Lang (EN-US) 229 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) Defendant Brian Frost submits this response in opposition to the Motion to Disqualify filed. /K [42 295 0 R 44] See, e.g., People v. Shari, 204 P.3d 453, 457 (Colo. 2009) (distinguishing between duties to current clients under Colo. RPC 1.7 and to former clients under Colo. RPC 1.9). 54 0 obj << << /P 12 0 R << << endobj << /P 508 0 R 1 [233 0 R 234 0 R 235 0 R 236 0 R 237 0 R 238 0 R 239 0 R 240 0 R 241 0 R 242 0 R endobj ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Disqualify is GRANTED and Andrew J. Cevasco, Esquire is disqualified pursuant to New Jersey Rule of Professional Conduct 3.7 from serving as legal counsel for the Defendants at the trial in this matter; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to R. 1:5-1(a) that a copy of this Order will be 365 0 obj >> >> /Lang (EN-US) << /S /P /Superscript /Span /Parent 6 0 R 274 0 obj << /S /P /Pg 45 0 R Litigation and Dispute Resolution in the UnitedStates, Four Things to Know About Motions to Disqualify. endobj /K 13 This is because it must be presumed that a client shared confidences with its attorney pursuant to the attorneyclient relationship.9 Appreciating this distinction is important to successfully making or defeating a motion to disqualify. /K [14 516 0 R] /Pg 39 0 R /Parent 10 0 R 0000004058 00000 n /Annots [] /K 10 /Contents [429 0 R 430 0 R 431 0 R] << /K 14 25 0 obj << /Pg 16 0 R /Annots [] 50 0 obj /Pg 18 0 R 15 316 0 R 16 [127 0 R 128 0 R 129 0 R 130 0 R 131 0 R] /Lang (EN-US) endobj endobj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Pg 16 0 R 135 0 obj endobj /Pg 15 0 R endobj /A 522 0 R /S /Reference A Motion to Disqualify: Tempting, but Dangerous - Corporate Counsel /K [1 305 0 R 3] /S /P 1 18 U.S.C. /Type /Page 99 0 obj 5 0 obj 0000003370 00000 n 153 0 obj 294 0 obj 176 0 obj >> /Lang (EN-US) /S /H2 /P 12 0 R /K 17 /Pg 20 0 R Occasionally a Motion, Opposition, or . All rights reserved. 23 [152 0 R 153 0 R 154 0 R 155 0 R] /P 12 0 R 78 0 obj /Parent 10 0 R /Parent 11 0 R /S /P /Lang (EN-US) >> << /K [26 287 0 R 28] >> /S /Reference motion to disqualify. /Pg 20 0 R endobj /Lang (EN-US) /S /Reference hearing. /S /P Motions (a) Motion and opposition (1) Except as these rules provide otherwise, a party wanting to make a motion in a reviewing court must serve and file a written motion stating the grounds and the relief requested and identifying any documents on which the motion is based. /Parent 3 0 R /K 12 Motions - Utah Courts >> CV1810311PADFMX, 2020 WL 2374947 (C.D. /P 505 0 R >> /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /A 520 0 R /Annots [] /K 21 /Pg 38 0 R /Pg 20 0 R /PageLayout /OneColumn /Pg 15 0 R /Lang (EN-US) >> << /P 506 0 R /P 507 0 R /S /P /Pg 22 0 R Dec. 18, 2014) (denying motion for summary judgment on issue of whether Hunton & Williams should be disqualified in underlying arbitration), assets.law360news.com/ 0580000/580691/Memorandum%20and%20Order.pdf; Defendant and Counterclaimant Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas LLCs Notice of Motion and Motion to Disqualify Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof, Western Sugar Coop. endobj /P 531 0 R << In New York, that motion requires: the existence of a prior attorney-client relationship between the moving party and opposing counsel. /S /H2 /Resources 444 0 R Turn in your completed forms by mail or efiling. /Lang (EN-US) /K 14 /Lang (EN-US) United States v. Ashman, 979 F.2d at 494; United States v. Roberson, 897 F.2d 1092, 1098 (11th Cir. /Pg 17 0 R >> /K 12 >> >> /Lang (EN-US) << 103 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) The motion is legally sufficient if it shows the party's well-grounded fear that the party will not receive a fair trial. >> >> endobj /P 12 0 R at 391. 354 0 obj /K 0 /Lang (EN-US) endobj PDF Motions to Disqualify Judges for Bias or Prejudice /Pg 19 0 R << /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Pg 18 0 R /Contents [396 0 R 397 0 R 398 0 R] /Parent 7 0 R FQ7#cM,u?ZFQwxduOnb'X)6&>7nM,m?GO68Gvxdmo8mbhX0&Eob;X1&Aob& s;F16cM,~c;716i96xcG96x#@&MM]Mgi gysl?/y?/y?/y?/y?/y?/mb],mr&^L3M*>qM&>mDYoIM >y'NHf08l&;f07axNo8_37d c{F=sX1`n #>k0807t!\}sWU0|psV77f Y}ps#VG77^ W}tsU`U_a>{n>Q|n>0|JsS47:) N}JscS4729L}Ns#STq>vndl>qvnXl>1OwnHpssqqq q";oDqxgyxx&m&H5s)0/-0Zx[6":)L6/f0K-d8ToXL1Nx6T5q,&EB1Qx6%)2FcIjIS-)2%ERY[gZVdUjY1X-q,Y1Y-+26eEhXYq10\(2EtVzVU8&E{"cZUdXkw.gvUEqd*2UE&E['s"cZSdZkEkM1i)265E?6)2f5E66(2m. /P 12 0 R >> /Pg 45 0 R "response to General Michael T. Flynn's Motion to Disqualify Judge Emmet Sullivan, United States v. Flynn, 17-cr-232 (Doc. /Pg 37 0 R /Tabs /S 0000001952 00000 n /Parent 11 0 R endobj II. /Annotation /Span << 317 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) However, Comment 3 to Colo. RPC 1.9 sets a minimum baseline: In the case of an organizational client, general knowledge of the clients policies and practices ordinarily will not preclude a subsequent representation..