If you quit now, the Postal Service will get away with causing you harm, and justice will not be served. The Postal Service, as well as several other attorneys representing claimants, requested additional time to object to the Administrative Judges Order approving the use of Special Masters. Of course, please feel free to call our office again at 585-272-0540, and you may be able to get through. Please send our office a copy of any letters that you receive from the Postal Service as soon as possible. In addition, it is possible that the Special Masters valuation of 2,200+ claims will help the parties evaluate possible settlement of claims. Please also send us a copy of the initial claim form and any supporting documents you submitted to the postal service, the dispute letter, and the Final Agency Decision. While the Agency once again attempted to further delay the matter by claiming that some of the data such as disability status was not something they had access to in the requested format, our offices were quick to point out systems in which such information could be accessed by the Postal Service. 7. At the conclusion, the Administrative Judge directed both sides to submit certain revisions to the spreadsheet by no later than October 21, 2022. Today we filed our response to the USPS filing, pointing out that the USPS proposal would slow down the processing of these claims for no good reason. The Judge emphasized the very large volume of documentation submitted to her, and also indicated that limited time and assistance was available to her. This proposal is consistent with many other successful class actions. The two law firms that serve as Class Counsel will work together to represent you, and your 30% contingency fee will cover all contingency fee payments to the law firms. Yes, we can email you a copy of your responses, but please be aware that the survey information came through to our office in an excel file, so the responses are not necessarily easy to follow. The Postal Service continues to vigorously oppose all forward movement on the Judges Order regarding Special Masters. On July 15, 2022, USPS submitted a spreadsheet to the EEOC Administrative Judge, and also to us as Phase I Class Counsel. We deeply appreciate your extraordinary patience as this lengthy process moves forward. We wanted to reach out and give a quick update on the case, and answer some questions that have been raised. We currently have no information regarding the nature of the EEOCs website or the notice, so unfortunately cannot yet provide answers to questions you may have, but we will provide a detailed update as soon as we have additional information. USPS NRP Class Action Lawsuit Settlement - Juris Laws NRP Class Action Update December 2020 - Postal Employee Network Attention: The McConnell Case (NRP Class Action) has been resolved in favor of the claimants: ie Postal Employees. We will provide an update as soon as a decision is issued regarding our motion for sanctions. Please continue to monitor our website for more updates in the coming weeks. Free shipping. Thomas & Solomon 585-272-0540. We will not submit claim packages for claimants who have not retained our firms to represent them in the claims process. Denver, CO 80202. We recommend emailing such letters to us at NRPclassaction@theemploymentattorneys.com or faxing us at (585) 272-0574. The judge directed that the USPS set up a website to post updates and orders in this case, and USPS announced that the website was now set up at www.uspsclassactionclaims.com. If you have previously retained Class Counsel to represent you in your individual claim, we will specifically name you in our appeal from the FADs, and you do not need to submit a separate FAD appeal notice to the EEOC. We have not spoken with USPS attorneys about settlement of any claims. EEOC rules and guidelines require all parties to be willing to discuss the possibility of settlement with the EEOC Judge. The Judge partially granted our motion. We are pressing forward and will not be deterred, despite this latest delay tactic by USPS. If you are a person who is hard of hearing or deaf, and you need an alternative method of receiving the information, please reach out to our office directly via email at nrpclassaction@theemploymentattorneys.com or by telephone at 585-272-0540. In the near future, we will address frequently asked questions regarding the form and evidence on this website. Many of you have asked about the next steps in the EEOC process. If you have trouble accessing the website referenced in the notice from the EEOC, you can call 877-465-4142 for assistance. (For better or worse, the Postal Service has a reputation for preferring delay and continued litigation over prompt appropriate settlement.). Please continue to monitor this website for status updates. We also noted that even their responses to the EEOC Administrative Judges questioning was further demonstration of their pattern of behavior: delay, deny, delay, deny. In particular, the EEOC Administrative Judge wants to have the relevant information in a spreadsheet format that would allow the Judge to easily access the information, with a goal of moving forward with the process of claim determination. The Judge also set a briefing schedule for a sanctions motion recently filed by our offices against the Postal Service. In addition, we have concerns with the Postal Services continuing efforts to break apart the Class and over-burden the EEOC. Our offices also agreed to provide some additional information that should assist the process which was obtained from the Postal Service during the course of the litigation and should provide the EEOC Judge with much of the requested information. Detailed instructions on completing the Declaration form are available by clicking here. You should include specific names of people that harassed you, and approximate dates to the best you can. You can access the Declaration (with instructions) by clicking here. Last Friday, Judge Roberts-Draper issued a schedule for talking to the lawyers about the possibility of settlement. A significant amount of legal work remains to be accomplished as we press forward on every front. However, the Judge emphasized the perils of seeking a FAD: If a claimant seeks a FAD and gets nothing, the process of appeal and hearings and evidence starts all over again for that individual complaint and if there has been a settlement in the McConnell Class Action, said Complaint runs the risk of being foreclosed for any review of their claims or compensation from any prospective settlement.. If you have questions about the NRP class action claims process, please review this FAQ section. The best way to provide this information is to email us at nrpclassaction@theemploymentattorneys.com. For example, if a manager told you that you had no other option than to retire, you should write out on a Continuation sheet a brief description of who said it to you and an approximate date, to the best you can. There is no way currently for us to get you back in your position until the EEOC Administrative Judge issues an order. Our goal, like yours, is to continue fighting for a fair and reasonable outcome. Our goal is to move the claims forward as fast as possible with a fair and efficient process for all claimants. Please continue to monitor this website for further updates. In our view, this order reflects the Judges determination to press forward as fast as possible despite all efforts by USPS to delay and disrupt the claim review process. We will continue to provide updates on this website as notable developments occur. Please continue to monitor this website for updates on the case. Accordingly, we are pressing forward on all fronts, and our goal remains as before: we seek full recovery for all our clients. We will conduct discovery and an investigation into your claim, based on the information we already have about the case and in seeking new information and records related to your claim. This is a big victory for all claimants, and a giant step toward conclusion of this process. If you receive a request from us for additional information, we urge you to respond as soon as possible. * Damage awards in other lawsuits are only identified as an example of the types of settlements obtained and However, attorneys and staff are working remotely, and we are monitoring our voicemail. The Order states that the process to be used is that the Postal Service is to submit their legal brief and evidence by March 19, 2019, and then Claimants have 20 days to submit their legal brief and evidence. While neither spoke during the video call, EEOC Administrative Judge Roberts-Draper did take several breaks in order to confer with her team and review her notes. In the meantime, we continue to collect and organize a very large amount of claim information for timely submission to the Judge. There is not a magic number for how much information should be submitted. Thomas & Friends Trackmaster JAMES MOTORIZED Train Tank Engine 2009 WORKS! We need you to return the completed, signed Declaration form to us no later than March 25, 2019, in order for us to prepare and submit your complete claim package (including legal argument) to the EEOC Judge in a timely fashion. In response to the Administrative Judges February Order setting out a process to review claims by the use of Special Masters, the Postal Service filed a motion seeking to both delay the case and encourage as many class members as possible to withdraw from the case. For an evaluation of your circumstances and legal options, reach us online here. For most claimants, filling out the form will take less than one hour. The Agency must complete their portion by June 15, 2022 and Phase 1 Class Counsel shall complete their portion by July 15, 2022. If you think you have witnesses who can provide a supporting statement, go ahead and ask them to do so. We hope the EEOC will act quickly to restore order to this process. We remain extremely grateful to all who have hired us to represent their interests in this fight against the Postal Service. Recently many claimants have been asking about the timeline as to when claims will be evaluated. Unfortunately, some of our clients in this case have passed away. The EEOC Judge has issued a Case Management Order requiring all claimants to submit information to verify class membership and identify all categories of relief. If the EEOC orders the Postal Service to pay attorney fees related to your claim, those fees would come directly to us and not relate in any way to the 30% contingency fee payment.Of course, as the case proceeds, we are unable to predict what the final outcome will be. Put another way, for all claimants who hired our law firms, we will not cease our fight on your behalf until the Postal Service provides a fair and reasonable resolution, or there is a final EEOC decision on your claim, whichever occurs first. For more information about the Pittman class action, please go to http://www.pittmanclass.com. Our attorneys continue to work on this case, and we are in regular contact with the Judge. All information is ordered to be produced to Judge Roberts-Draper on or before Wednesday, June 8, 2022. Otherwise, the Postal Service and other employers will continue to discriminate against workers with disabilities. Our battle with the Postal Service continues regarding their refusal to provide evidence to the EEOC Judge in connection with individual claims for relief. As of July 15, 2019, we have filed a legal brief (Statement) and evidence on behalf of all Claimants who are represented by our law firms. In addition, the Administrative Judge has also requested that our offices eliminate a small number of duplicate entries. (A copy of the Declaration form is available by clicking this link). The Judge went on to explain that although claimants themselves can seek a FAD and thus leave this case, the Judge also said it is: unclear why any claimant would opt out of the class and seek a FAD. And as always, please continue to monitor this website for any important updates. The Agency is responsible for providing the remainder of the information, which includes but is not limited to: date of hire; separation date; separation reason; and which claims are alleged by claimant and which claims the Agency disputes. 8. USPS proposes that all Class Members move forward independently through a process that seeks to hide evidence from the Class Members and the EEOC Administrative Judge, seeks to endlessly hold up decisions on the relief claims, and ultimately undercuts every Class Member's claim for relief. Please note that the Judge did not order USPS to provide a copy of the NRP Activity File documents directly to any claimants in the case. * As always, we greatly appreciate your patience during this process. With this clarification, we will continue the time-consuming process of preparing the claim submissions for the Judges consideration. We promised the Judge we would do everything we can to help the EEOC issue claim determinations as soon as possible. nrp class action | PostalReporter.com Again, do the best you can with the information you know. She set a deadline of March 31, 2020 to submit any and all supplemental documentation regarding claims. We strongly encourage you to submit a completed Declaration to us in order to enhance your claim for monetary relief. As noted in our February 2021 update, the Judge recently issued an Order setting out a process for reviewing claims in this case. We all owe much of our success in this case to the unity, strength, and perseverance that the Class has shown in the face of unceasing attacks by the Postal Service for more than ten years. Before calling, please review the instructions carefully and be sure to check www.NRPclassaction.com, because the answer to your question may be answered there. For our clients, please provide your updated contact information to us. In particular, Judge Roberts-Draper indicated that she reviewed all the information submitted and ultimately ordered the parties to each submit certain information about claimants in an excel spreadsheet. This can be done by going to the website, www.eeoc-nrpphase2.com, or by calling 877-465-4142. First, the Judge announced that the special website created for this case will be posted and active in the coming weeks. Our contact information is as follows: Address:693 East AvenueRochester, NY 14607, Email Address:NRPclassaction@theemploymentattorneys.com. Salomon v A Salomon and Co Ltd [1897] AC 22. The EEOC has never been faced with a claimant class this large. You should mark the boxes for every statement that applies to your situation. Our attorneys have just learned that the EEOC has begun sending out notices to claimants regarding the EEOCs website related to this case. 4. Without your patience and persistence, the Postal Service would have won without a fight. This means that if you have updated your contact information, including address, phone number, email address, and/or name, through the EEOC website (www.eeoc-nrpphase2.com) or by calling the third party number identified in the EEOCs recent communication, you must also contact our office as well to update the information. We are dedicated to achieving the best results for you in this case, and we will not let the USPS game of dragging this process out free them from their legal obligations. We have filed an extension request with the Judge. We will promptly provide an update on this website as soon as that information is available. Other people used a different claim form, then filled out a written retainer agreement with our office. We will provide an update to the website as soon as the Judge issues a decision. However, before you turn down any relief, you should speak with Class Counsel to explore your options. We will provide updated information regarding the process on this website. Additionally, Judge Roberts-Draper also scheduled a status conference with the Agency and Phase 1 Class Counsel for May 12, 2022 at 11:00 am. Nevertheless, those survey responses might help give you a starting point! The Administrative Judge ordered USPS to provide certain missing NRP Activity File pages to the attorneys by May 28, 2019. How is withdrawing from the class and requesting a FAD beneficial to the individual claimant (who risks getting nothing from the Agency) or to the class (whose numbers will quickly lessen)? We will provide you with written instructions on what to include to support your claim. There will be a Spanish translation of the recording also available at the same number. I was told that I would be sent to work for Walmart; or We encourage every Class Member claimant to fully participate in this stage of the case, so that you can maximize the relief available to you. For this submission, you must mail the completed, signed Declaration form to us by March 25, 2019. To learn more about the case, please visit NRPclassaction.com. Since no decision has been issued on any of the disputed claims, NO ONE IS ENTITLED TO A FAD. According to the decision, Phase 1 of NRP consisted largely of reviewing the files and medical records of all these employees; where needed requesting updated medical documentation from the employee; and verifying that current work actually being performed matched the current job offer. So I understood that I had no option but to retire; or, I was told that I would be sent to work for Walmart; or, They indicated that I would lose my job and my retirement benefits, so I felt I had no option except to retire; or, They would not give me an assignment that fit with my medical restrictions, so I had no option but to retire; or. Since the Agency has produced their portion of the spreadsheet, our attorneys have not only been working on their portions of the spreadsheet, but have also begun raising concerns with the Agency as to deficiencies in their portion of the spreadsheet. Yes. We respond promptly to inquiries. Significantly, the EEOC Administrative Judge made clear that only Thomas & Solomon LLP and Kator, Parks, Weiser & Harris PLLC, along with the Agency, will be working directly with the Judge both during the call itself and as we move forward with this process. We recommend that if you do receive a letter about the Pittman v. USPS class action, you request a copy of your claim form and retain it for your records. And please call or email us if you have questions. The letters state that the USPS has possession of your settlement claim form from the Pittman class action, and you can request a copy of the claim form from the USPS. You should include in a Continuation sheet a description of why you concluded or felt that you had to retire or separate at that time.If applicable to you, here are some possible short statements that can help explain what happened: Now that the Postal Service has disputed every individual claim for relief (over 28,000), the EEOC must establish a fair and efficient claims determination process in accordance with EEOC rules. (If you have already completed that form and submitted it to us, there is no other action needed by you at this time.). As a result of the Judges order, we soon should have all NRP Activity Files in connection with our firms clients. You do not need to send us documents that you already sent us. You may email our office at nrpclassaction@theemploymentattorneys.com or call us at 585-272-0540. At the upcoming Status Conference we hope to learn more about the EEOCs plan to move this process forward. If you have not yet received the notice from the EEOC, please continue to be patient for a fewmore days. A status conference with the EEOC Administrative Judge is scheduled for March 20, 2019. The Judge has indicated a desire to resolve this issue promptly, if possible. U.S. The Judge issued an order today, providing us with an extra 90 days to file submissions for our clients. You should mail this letter to: USPS - NELU The types of relief you could be entitled to are based on your particular situation and may include lost pay and benefits, reinstatement to your job at the Postal Service, along with reinstatement of any accommodations the Postal Service withdrew as part of the NRP.