There are many other applications that can create bootable disks but Ventoy comes with its sets of features. Well occasionally send you account related emails. Open File Explorer and head to the directory where you keep your boot images. I should also note that the key used in Ventoy is the same used in Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk, my key. @ventoy What's going on here? Have a question about this project? sharafat.pages.dev Ventoy loads Linux kernels directly, which are also signed with embedded Shim certificate. Sign in However, I'm not sure whether chainloading of shims are allowed, and how it would work if you try to load for example Ubuntu when you already have Fedora's shim loaded. Download non-free firmware archive. And unfortunately, because Ventoy is derived from GRUB 2.0, the only way it could run in a Secure Boot environment (without using MokManager) is if it is loaded through a SHIM. Now, if Microsoft finally relinquished their abusive policy about not accepting GPLv3 code for Secure Boot signing and Ventoy was updated not to allow unsigned bootloaders when Secure Boot is enabled (i.e. Please thoroughly test the archive and give your feedback, what works and what don't. I would assert that, when Secure Boot is enabled, every single time an unsigned bootloader is loaded, a warning message should be displayed. Adding an efi boot file to the directory does not make an iso uefi-bootable. Must hardreset the System. So, Ventoy can also adopt that driver and support secure boot officially. Can I reformat the 1st (bigger) partition ? Can't say for others, but I made Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk with that exact purpose: to bypass Secure Boot validation policy. Nevertheless, thanks for the explanation, it cleared up some things for me around the threat model of Secure Boot. In a fit of desperation, I tried another USB drive - this one 64GB instead of 8GB. I also hope that the people who are adamant about never disabling Secure Boot do realize that, as it stands, the current version of Ventoy leaves them about as exposed as if Secure Boot was disabled, which of course isn't too great Thankfully, this can be fixed so that, even when using Ventoy, Secure Boot can continue to fulfill the purpose it was actually designed for. I'll think about it and try to add it to ventoy. then there is no point in implementing a USB-based Secure Boot loader. The only way to prevent misuse when booting from USB is to set a BIOS password (and perhaps a boot password), set the BIOS to not boot from USB and it won't hurt to also use an encrypted filesystem for the OS on the hard disk (bitlocker/LUKS). Ventoy up to 1.0.12 used the /dev/mapper/ventoy approach to boot. Ventoy does support Windows 10 and 11 and users can bypass the Windows 11 hardware check when installing. Ventoy has added experimental support for IA32 UEFI since v1.0.30. Tested ISO: https://github.com/rescuezilla/rescuezilla/releases/download/2.4/rescuezilla-2.4-64bit.jammy.iso. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! fails to find system in /slax, 'Hello System' os can boot successfully with bootx64.efi's machine and show desktop. It means that the secure boot solution doesn't work with your machine, so you need to turn off the option, and disable secure boot in the BIOS. And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. Then the process of reading your "TPM-secured" disk becomes as easy as: User awareness that their encrypted data was read: Nil. Just create a FAT32 partition, change its label to ARCH_YYYYMM (fill in the ISO's date, now it would be ARCH_202109) and extract the Arch ISO to it. Thank you both for your replies. Secure Boot was supported from Ventoy 1.0.07, an option for secure boot is added in Ventoy2Disk.exe/Ventoy2Disk.sh. Already on GitHub? Tested on ASUS K40IN ", same error during creating windows 7 Freebsd has some linux compatibility and also has proprietary nvidia drivers. V4 is legacy version. Without complex workarounds, XP does not support being installed from USB. only ventoy give error "No bootfile found for UEFI! Something about secure boot? No bootfile found for UEFI with Ventoy, But OK witth rufus. Please follow the guid bellow. In WIMBOOT mode (ctrl+w) I get 'Loading files. xx%' and then screen resolution changes and get nice Windows Setup GUI. I still don't know why it shouldn't work even if it's complex. Could you please also try via BIOS/Legacy mode? 4. ext2fsd PS: It works fine with original ventoy release (use UEFIinSecureBoot) when Secure boot is enabled. Parrot-security-4.9.1_x64.iso - 3.8 GB, eos-eos3.7-amd64-amd64.200310-013107.base.iso - 2.83 GB, minimal_linux_live_15-Dec-2019_64-bit_mixed.iso - 18.9 MB, OracleLinux-R7-U3-Server-x86_64-dvd.iso - 4.64 GB, backbox-6-desktop-amd64.iso - 2.51 GB https://osdn.net/projects/manjaro/storage/kde/, manjaro-kde-20.0-rc3-200422-linux56.iso BOOT For me I'm missing Hiren's Boot CD (https://www.hirensbootcd.org/) - it's WindowsPE based and supports UEFI from USB. Personally, I don't have much of an issue with Ventoy using the current approach as a stopgap solution, as long as it is agreed that this is only a stopgap, since it comes with a huge drawback, and that a better solution (validation of that the UEFI bootloaders chain loaded from GRUB pass Secure Boot validation when Secure Boot has been enabled by the user) needs to be implemented in the long run. Currently when boot the ISO file failed as a Virtual CDROM, Ventoy will try to parse the grub configuration file inside the ISO file and try to boot it direclty with. 1.0.84 UEFI www.ventoy.net ===> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1401532. That's an improvement, I guess? If anyone has an issue - please state full and accurate details. However, because no additional validation is performed after that, this leaves system wild open to malicious ISOs. I think it's ok as long as they don't break the secure boot policy. Paragon ExtFS for Windows @pbatard FFS I just spent hours reinstalling arch just to get this in the end archlinux-2021.06.01-x86_64.iso with Ventoy 1.0.47 boots for me on Lenovo IdeaPad 300 UEFI64 boot. Hi, Gentoo LiveDVD doesn't work, when I try to boot it, It's showing up the GRUB CLI Ventoy is supporting almost all of Arch-based Distros well. Asks for full pathname of shell. There are many kinds of WinPE. There are many kinds of WinPE. So all Ventoy's behavior doesn't change the secure boot policy. Thank you Tested on 1.0.57 and 1.0.79. There are many suggestion to use tools which make an ISO bootable with UEFI on a flash disk, however it's not that easy as you can only do that with UEFI-enabled ISO's. By UEFI enabled ISO's I mean that the ISO files contain a BOOT\EFI directory with a EFI bootloader. You literally move files around and use a text editor to edit theme.text, ventoy.json, and so on. Ventoy How to Install Windows 11 to Old PC without UEFI and TPM I'm afraid I'm very busy with other projects, so I haven't had a chance. Google for how to make an iso uefi bootable for more info. It typically has the same name, but you can rename it to something else should you choose to do so. Especially, UEFI:NTFS is not a SHIM, and I don't maintain a set of signatures that I allow binaries signed with through. That is to say, a WinPE.iso or ubuntu.iso file can be booted fine with secure boot enabled(even no need for the user to whitelist them) but it may contain a malicious application in it. I checked and they don't work. If you use the Linux kernel's EFI stub loader or ELILO, you may need to store your kernel on the ESP, so creating an ESP on the large end of the scale is advisable. Can't try again since I upgraded it using another method. So, this is debatable. Ventoy Is there a way to force Ventoy to boot in Legacy mode? Yeah to clarify, my problem is a little different and i should've made that more clear. The latest version of Ventoy, an open source program for Windows and Linux to create bootable media using image file formats such as ISO or WMI, introduces experimental support for the IMG file format.. Ventoy distinguishes itself from other programs of its kind, e.g. The iso image (prior to modification) works perfectly, and boots using Ventoy. Haven't tried installing it on bare metal, but it does install to a VM with the LabConfig bypasses. You can press left or right arrow keys to scroll the menu. All the userspace applications don't need to be signed. When it asks Delete the key (s), select Yes. Does the iso boot from s VM as a virtual DVD? slitaz-next-180716.iso, Symantec.Ghost.Boot.CD.12.0.0.10658.x64.iso, regular-xfce-latest-x86_64.iso - 1.22 GB I tested Manjaro ISO KDE X64. and leave it up to the user. Can't install Windows 7 ISO, no install media found ? Tried with archlinux-2021.05.01-x86_64 which is listed as compatible and it is working flawlessly. Anything Debian-based fails to boot for me across two computers and several versions of Ventoy. Many thousands of people use Ventoy, the website has a list of tested ISOs. Yes. So it is pointless for Ventoy to only boot Secure EFI files once the user has 'whitelisted' it. Optional custom shim protocol registration (not included in this build, creates issues). Click Bootable > Load Boot File. And it's possible that the UEFI specs went as far as specifying that specific aspects of the platform security, such as disk encryption through TPM, should only be available if Secure Boot is enabled. The main issue is that users should at least get some warning that a bootloader failed SB validation when SB is enabled, instead of just letting everything go through. Unable to boot properly. ElementaryOS boots just fine. Thanks. I think it's OK. But I was actually talking about CorePlus. Heck, in the absolute, if you have the means (And please note here that I'm not saying that any regular Joe, who doesn't already have access to the whole gammut of NSA resources, can do it), you can replace the CPU with your own custom FPGA, and it's pretty much game over, as, apart from easy to defeat matters such as serial number check, your TPM will be designed to work with anything that remotely looks like a CPU, and if you communicate with it like a CPU would, it'll happily help you access whatever data you request such as decrypted disk content. Single x64 ISO - OK - Works and install.esd found by Setup - all Editions listed Dual 32+64 ISO - FAIL - Did not find install.esd file (either 64 or 32) \x64\sources\ and \x32\sources in ISO UEFI64 Boot: Single x64 ISO - FAIL - 'No boot file found by UEFI' ' Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI!' Format Ext4 in Linux: sudo mkfs -t ext4 /dev/sdb1 With ventoy, you don't need to format the disk over and over, you just need to copy the ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD (x)/EFI. We recommend downloading this PC Repair tool (rated Great on TrustPilot.com) to easily address them. relativo a la imagen iso a utilizar On the other hand, I'm pretty sure that, if you have a Secure Boot capable system, then firmware manufacturers might add a condition that you can only use TPM-based encryption if you also have Secure Boot enabled, as this can help reduce attack vectors against the TPM (by preventing execution of arbitrary code at the early UEFI boot stage, which may make poking around the TPM easier if it has a vulnerability). ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi - FOTO SKOLA Copyright Windows Report 2023. Hi, HDClone 9.0.11 ISO is stating on UEFI succesfully but on Legacy after choose "s" or "x64" to start hdclone it open's a black windows in front of the Ventoy Menu and noting happens more. I have tried the latest release, but the bug still exist. This option is enabled by default since 1.0.76. Yes. After install, the 1st larger partition is empty, and no files or directories in it. No bootfile found for UEFI, maybe the image doesnt support ia32 uefi error, asus t100ta Kinda solved: Cant install arch, but can install linux mint 64 bit. For these who select to bypass secure boot. The point is that if a user whitelists Ventoy using MokManager, they are responsible for anything that they then subsequently run using Ventoy. Ctrl+i to change boot mode of some ISOs to be more compatible Ctrl+w to use wimboot to boot Windows and WinPE ISOs (e.g. Sign in . So I apologise for that. The injection is just like that I extract the ubuntu.iso and change/add some script and create an new ISO file. ? ubuntu-20.10-desktop-amd64.iso everything is fine If instead I try to install the ISO ubuntu-22.04.1-desktop-amd64.iso I get the following error message: "No bootfile found for UEFI! Yes ! Vmware) with UEFI mode and to confirm that the ISO file does support UEFI mode. But, even as I don't actually support the idea that Secure Boot is useless if someone has physical access to the device (that was mostly Steve positing this as a means to justify that not being able to detect Secure Boot breaches on USB media isn't that big a deal), I do believe there currently still exist a bit too many ways to ensure that you can compromise a machine, if you have access to said machine. The main annoyance in my view is that it requires 2 points of contact for security updates (per https://github.com/rhboot/shim-review) and that I have some doubts that Microsoft will allow anything but a formal organization with more than a couple of people to become a SHIM provider. Is Ventoy checking md5sums and refusing to load an iso that doesn't match or something? Boot net installer and install Debian. It should be specially noted that, no matter USB drive or local disk, all the data will be lost after install Ventoy, please be very careful. all give ERROR on my PC maybe that's changed, or perhaps if there's a setting somewhere to On one of my Laptop Problem with HBCD_PE_x64.iso Uefi on start from Desktop error with Autoit v3: Pintool.exe Application error. SB works using cryptographic checksums and signatures. And IMO, anything that attempts to push the idea that, maybe, allowing silent boot of unsigned bootloaders is not that bad, is actually doing a major disservice to users, as it does weaken the security of their system and, if this is really what a user wants, they can and should disable Secure Boot. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: tails-amd64-4.5.iso Legacy tested with VM New version of Rescuezilla (2.4) not working properly. So the new ISO file can be booted fine in a secure boot enviroment. see http://tinycorelinux.net/13.x/x86_64/release/ TinyCorePure64-13.1.iso does UEFI64 boot OK The file size will be over 5 GB. How to mount the ISO partition in Linux after boot ? 2. . Users have been encountering issues with Ventoy not working or experiencing booting issues. This seem to be disabled in Ventoy's custom GRUB). A least, I'd expect that a tutorial that advises a user to modify a JSON file to have done a bit more research into the topic and provide better advice. Any ideas? always used Archive Manager to do this and have never had an issue. I didn't try install using it though. Ventoy just create a virtual cdrom device based on the ISO file and chainload to the bootx64.efi/shim.efi inside the ISO file. boots, but kernel panic: did not find boot partitions; opens a debugger. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. The user could choose to run a Microsoft Windows Install ISO downloaded from the MS servers and Ventoy could inject a malicious file into it as it boots. Link: https://www.mediafire.com/file/5zui8pq5p0p9zug/Windows10_SuperLite_TeamOS_Edition.iso/file Cantt load some ISOs - Ventoy try 1.0.09 beta1? slax 15.0 boots