A decision requires further reviews. Author's version of the manuscript of a paper that has been accepted for publication and which may include any author-incorporated changes suggested through the peer review process. [CDATA[> This should state the main question addressed by the research and summarize the goals, approaches, and conclusions of the paper. You should also consider whether there is any in-built bias not nullified by the control experiments. The coatings exhibit remarkable surface-protective performance, including anticorrosion, antifouling, self-healing, anti-icing, and self-cleaning properties. If no news is good news, blank news is great news? After Acceptance. However, if you spot grammatical errors that affect clarity of meaning, then it's important to highlight these. In the previous rounds, an email was received once the status went blank. One of my manuscripts is there for nearly 4 months. In this pandemic situation, it's highly likely that the processing time will delay a bit longer than normal. Two weeks later, the status was updated from "All reviewers Assigned" to "Manuscript under consideration", and four days later, to a blank Stage as shown in yours. After all, you need the context of the whole paper before deciding to reject. For example, one of the reviewers may have accepted the online invitation initially; and let the editor/associate editor know that s/he may have some conflict of interest. Does anyone have any idea why this is happening? A typical manuscript will have the following sections in the following order: Title page (as the first page of the main document) Title should not state a conclusion or pose a question* A. Menu mayberry funeral home lewisburg, tn. Where improvements are needed, a recommendation for major or minor revision is typical. If you are a co-author, you may be able to check the status if you received a co-author verification email, and have logged in to validate your relationship to the . Detailed instructions for article submission for individual journals are available for most Wiley journals along with more information on contact editor information on Wiley Online Library. Authors may make the case that a topic hasn't been investigated in several years and that new research is required. All data that are used to draw conclusions from your study must be available for consideration during the review of your manuscript and available to the larger scientific community following publication in Clinical and Translational Science. If not, say which are not, Write clearly and so you can be understood by people whose first language is not English, Avoid complex or unusual words, especially ones that would even confuse native speakers, Number your points and refer to page and line numbers in the manuscript when making specific comments, If you have been asked to only comment on specific parts or aspects of the manuscript, you should indicate clearly which these are, Treat the author's work the way you would like your own to be treated, Give constructive feedback describing ways that they could improve the research, Keep the focus on the research and not the author. Should the authors consider resubmitting to the same journal after language improvements? Article Types. 2004 14.04.04 1524 -. Is the paper well written? drafted the initial manuscript, revised and finalised the content. This situation is under active review. Marnett, Cohen, Fukushima, Gooderham, Hecht, Rietjens, and Smith interpreted the results and drafted the manuscript. Aims and Scope. Can you just throw some light on the process? Conflict of Interest. The manuscript needs to be revised by the authors before it can possibly be accepted. Are the conclusions consistent with the evidence and arguments presented? under review 12,3 . Many journals don't provide criteria for reviews beyond asking for your 'analysis of merits'. But in June 2022, the journal was removed from SCI indexing, what can i do, so much of work in it with two revsions taking more than a year,what can be done, Why is a PhD essential to become a peer-reviewer. Current treatments are designed to alleviate the pain by either using . HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses. Advice for Authors Interested in Peer Review: Editors Share Insights Exposure of dentin tubules due to loss of protective enamel (crown) and cementum (root) tissues as a result of erosion, mechanical wear, gingival recession, etc. Peer Review Comments, Cover Letter And More. 1 INTRODUCTION. The status of under review means that the paper has been sent . Some journals offer the option to recommend rejection with the possibility of resubmission this is most relevant where substantial, major revision is necessary. If you are unsure it may be better to disclose these in the confidential comments section. Combining bidirectional long shortterm memory and selfattention Often you can't see these until you log in to submit your review. Motivation: The only problem is they do not update you on the status of your manuscript for the moment you submit it, it just stayed at "under consideration", which made us feel that it was still under editorial review. //-->Can taxonsampling effects be minimized by using branch supports What Does It Mean When Your Application is Under Consideration? This review article analyzes the current state of the 2D and 3D deformable displays and discusses the technological challenges to be achieved for practical uses and industrial commercialization. Authors should retain their unprocessed data and metadata files, as editors may request them to aid in manuscript evaluation. A submitted manuscript must be an original contribution not previously published (conference presentations nor posting on recognized preprint servers constitute prior publication), must not be under consideration for publication elsewhere, and, if accepted, must not be . Subscribe and get curated content that will give impetus to your research paper. Your review should ultimately help the author improve their article. Examples of possibly major flaws include: If experimental design features prominently in the paper, first check that the methodology is sound - if not, this is likely to be a major flaw. This section is usually no more than a few paragraphs and may be presented as part of the results and discussion, or in a separate section. accept, reject, revise and resubmit, etc.) Lol one paper from our lab went 1.5 years before publication. "that it is not under consideration for publication . This helps developing researchers improve their work and explains to the editor why you felt the manuscript should not be published. Where methods are not detailed enough, it's usual to ask for the methods section to be revised. Copyright 2023 FAQS.TIPS. You should also try to be objective and constructive, not subjective and destructive. Fabrication of practical deformable displays: advances and challenges What does it mean if the status is 'under consideration' for two weeks? Once at a time. In some cases, you likewise attain not discover the broadcast Organizational Assessment Perspectives On The Measurement Of Organizational Behavior And The Quality Of Work . I am also concerned about the second possibility as some other peers also told me about that possibility. If you find - or already knew of - a very similar paper, this may be because the author overlooked it in their own literature search. At the other sister journals, it is a crap shoot as to what this means. It has been like that for a few days without any email notification. Sie suchen nach einem 70413 lego, das Ihren Ansprchen gerecht wird? Do the keywords accurately reflect the content? crash in glendale, az Order Supplement. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics Are citations excessive, limited, or biased? Under spinal anesthesia, . The chances of. [CDATA[> Ritardo Rogito Per Colpa Banca, You may check the journals website to confirm the contact details of the editorial office for any communication. TCE Subject Editors' Areas of Expertise for Submitting Authors Editorial policies - Preprint Sharing | Springer | Springer wiley manuscript status under consideration The issue under consideration in this paper is a multi-objective optimization problem that uses MGs to determine the production of renewable and non-renewable sources, charge and discharge of electrical and thermal storage, production of auxiliary boilers, and determine the optimal location and size of capacitors. Expect to suggest such amendments - it's rare for a manuscript to pass review with no corrections. [CDATA[> Authors should disclose details of preprint posting, including DOI and licensing terms, upon submission of the manuscript or at any other point during consideration at a Springer Nature . We hypothesize that this response is caused by leaf structural change associated with altered tissue water status; under cold winter conditions, leaves often remove water from their mesophyll cells, preventing intracellular freezing, as ice formation within the cells of the leaves is deadly (Steponkus, 1984; Li & Christersson, 1993; Buchanan et . Full disclosure: Editage Insights is a product of Editage, a global provider of world-class scientific communication solutions. Usually, if there is a desk rejection, it happens quite soon, within the first few days. by highlighting certain parts of an image). When a tree is evaluated that contains only a subset of the taxa in the reference tree, the identification of clades in the subset tree with clades from the reference tree presents a fundamental problem (Goloboff and Pol, 2002; Goloboff, 2005).Often, it is impossible to identify a clade from a partial analysis unequivocally with a single containing clade from the reference tree. If you have submitted a manuscript, you'll be able to log in to Editorial Manager (EM) as the corresponding author to view the status of your submission. Is the evidence they present strong enough to prove their case? B.E. Instructions for authors - Cambridge Core . After four rounds of revision, the manuscript was sent out to only one reviewer. wiley manuscript status under consideration FREE COVID TEST can i take advil before a fasting blood test Book Appointment Now. Now that you have completed your preparations, you're ready to spend an hour or so reading carefully through the manuscript. Are there any factual, numerical or unit errors? When the status of your manuscript changes to under review, this means that it has passed the initial editorial checks. Auditory Outcomes in Children Who Undergo Cochlear Implantation Before Is the paper's premise interesting and important? You can also send the editorial board an email through the submission system. wiley manuscript status under consideration Where appropriate, authors . Where you feel that an image has been edited or manipulated without explanation, you should highlight this in a confidential comment to the editor in your report. What happened to your publication finally? Rt 395 in ct 1 . Read Wiley's Top 10 Publishing Ethics Tips for Authors here. Two weeks later, the status was updated from "All reviewers Assigned" to "Manuscript under consideration", and four days later, to a blank Stage as shown in yours. 8 Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 1999 . It's totally reasonable to send an email to the editor requesting a clarification. If you suspect plagiarism, including self-plagiarism, but cannot recall or locate exactly what is being plagiarized, notify the editor of your suspicion and ask for guidance. Full disclosure: Editage Insights is a product of Editage, a global provider of world-class scientific communication solutions. Probably your manuscript was sent to a reviewer, but due to some unavoidable inconvenience the reviewer decline to review and sent it back to the editor. The Global Burden of Disease (GBD): a critical resource for informed policymaking Everyone, all over the world, deserves to live a long life in full health. 1. Under Review: This status indicates that the manuscript has entered the review process. Originality and topicality can only be established in the light of recent authoritative research. Volume 73, Issue 3. My field of research is IoT security and cryptography analysis. A study on the rooting of O. lanceolata stem cuttings was conducted using a low-cost technology employed in commercial rooting stem cuttings of tea . Currently I am working on a project wherein I need to predict the estimated new Selling price of IPL players based on their current base price and previous years' performance & sold price. Don't worry about all these. Certain patterns of good reporting need to be followed by the author: Discussion should always, at some point, gather all the information together into a single whole. Are the correct references cited? Modified on: Tue, 10 Dec, 2019 at 11:12 PM. the CONSORT Statement for reporting randomized trials), The health and safety of all participants in the study was not compromised, They should start by describing in simple terms what the data show, They should make reference to statistical analyses, such as significance or goodness of fit, Once described, they should evaluate the trends observed and explain the significance of the results to wider understanding. Wiley manuscript status under consideration. All rights reserved. of my. //-->